tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5883899214355622864.post8278317192299527516..comments2023-10-06T00:04:18.327+11:00Comments on The Angriest: Doctor Who: "The Bells of St John"Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5883899214355622864.post-70491179197880271852013-04-17T09:23:39.010+10:002013-04-17T09:23:39.010+10:00I thought it was fairly paint by numbers. Not real...I thought it was fairly paint by numbers. Not really creepy at all, and certainly my 8 year old processed it without any ick factor.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14168569626904048820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5883899214355622864.post-60724765695411491352013-04-16T13:57:46.251+10:002013-04-16T13:57:46.251+10:00Except I didn't find the prologue sequence, or...Except I didn't find the prologue sequence, or Miss Kizlet's reversion to childhood, remotely straight-to-kiddies. They were some of the creepiest stuff the show's done in a while.Granthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05277173223422519172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5883899214355622864.post-72768714065826012622013-04-16T11:56:58.556+10:002013-04-16T11:56:58.556+10:00One note: my darling wife observed afterwards that...One note: my darling wife observed afterwards that this seemed a straight-to-kiddies episode, and that the series seems to be heading more and more towards a younger audience. The simplified plots play a part, but I don't think it helps that you have a young actor playing the Doctor like a young person, and a young sidekick playing the part like a sixteen year old kid.<br /><br />A little bit of depth and genuine darkness wouldn't go astray.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14168569626904048820noreply@blogger.com